Slowlycatchymonkey

Lovely.

He doesn't have to prove it, its not against the rules. Direct further comments to the solicitor, we'll see you in court

It's not Pete's fault, he hasn't seen real green for over 16 years now, just brown dust. I was in Wales on Monday, it's greener than a green thing.

Seats a bit high.

And judging by the two crumblies following me round the supermarket today a 20 year age gap is just the thing

I remember my Pops being affronted when "Old dears" started chatting him up. I'm sure in his head he thinks he's about 20 years younger than he is

All I can think about is that visor steaming up!

Beautiful. They deserve framing.

I may have been taking the michael a little bit but yer stunt pegs that explains it.

Brilliant pic. The field of vision in that visor is ENORMOUS!

Yes they were good, I don't understand why they let their reputation slide down the pan producing what they produce now. Sounds like you got a new lid when you got your Enfield, so long as theres something on that bonce

So are they some type of winged stabilisers or did you like to save enough space to have another bike riding either side of you?

I wouldn't compare enhancing a motorbike picture to trying to make yourself look younger. Maybe if you go bananas on the photo it starts to look more like art than a straight photo but I don't see that as a problem, a motorbike looking good is fine by me... and other's or they wouldn't vote it.

Caberg flips get good reviews. I tried one and would have bought it then n there but I also tried a heavily discounted Schuberth straight after and then the quality of it got me to open my wallet that wee bit more. Bell not so much. Not sure what happened to them. Not the fit or the quality you'd expect. But they do look good.

haha I had to restrain myself from making an "its all good man" joke

I'm betting the no photoshopping voters are the less tech savvy folk on here!

I was told in an overly stern tone by an instructor back in CBT land that the polystyrene degrades overtime even if you don't wear it which is why they have a 7 year from manufacture date limit on them. I declined to mention I was wearing my mothers 15 year old lid that was giving me a headache because it was two sizes too small

Fair enough

But Pete some of the ripe ages on here are going to be relying on "enhancement"

5 years wear time, 7 years after manufactured date. Not sure Im on for chucking a lid after 5 years but if the liner was going or the polystyrene wasn't rock solid I would.

Is that tiny plate legal over there?

Oh yes thats a proper warning shot across the bow isnt it, just signing the consent for stents is enough to make you contemplate your fate! Glad it turned out well for you.

Yep you can see when its been over done and if you don't like that sort of thing vote accordingly.

Nothing like a health care to make folk take stock is there. Apart from the horror of the health scare quite a lot of good can come out of it. You all fixed now?

I think it's fine and not just for if the lights bad. Who cares if its enhanced, if it's a good photo it's a good photo regardless of whether someone technicolored it, used an expensive camera, has done a photography course or has some other advantage. This isn't a professional photography competition. Banning stuff and rules is all a bit serious for something thats supposed to be lightweight fun. It's not a sport, photoshopping aint doping. I'm wondering if Pete's lack of wins has him trying to eliminate the competition?