Cupid Stunt Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 It's very true zzak, people seem to be oblivious to the facts in front of them Animal and plant life grew faster than at any other time in Earth's history when CO2 in the atmosphere was 400 times what it is now We are still technically in an ice age (determined by there being ice on the polar caps), we are in fact on the exit side of the curve right now and the Earth is going to get warmer, no question and now way to stop it, Human's influence will count for absolutely nothing. The people I worked with at the Woodland Trust came up with a dumb climate change saying "Trees eat carbon for breakfast" to which I responded "so why exactly is it you wish to get rid of carbon?" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boboneleg Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 7 minutes ago, Nute said: If further arguments are disproved are you just going to keep trawling the net for more ad infinitum? That's exactly what he does, he's got a pretty exciting life eh ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckster Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 minutes ago, Cupid Stunt said: It's very true zzak, people seem to be oblivious to the facts in front of them Animal and plant life grew faster than at any other time in Earth's history when CO2 in the atmosphere was 400 times what it is now We are still technically in an ice age (determined by there being ice on the polar caps), we are in fact on the exit side of the curve right now and the Earth is going to get warmer, no question and now way to stop it, Human's influence will count for absolutely nothing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Wait, there’s three of them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nute Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 16 hours ago, boboneleg said: That's exactly what he does, he's got a pretty exciting life eh ! … the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over ( showing someone why their argument is wrong) and expecting different results 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nute Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 16 hours ago, Cupid Stunt said: It's very true zzak, people seem to be oblivious to the facts in front of them Animal and plant life grew faster than at any other time in Earth's history when CO2 in the atmosphere was 400 times what it is now We are still technically in an ice age (determined by there being ice on the polar caps), we are in fact on the exit side of the curve right now and the Earth is going to get warmer, no question and now way to stop it, Human's influence will count for absolutely nothing. The people I worked with at the Woodland Trust came up with a dumb climate change saying "Trees eat carbon for breakfast" to which I responded "so why exactly is it you wish to get rid of carbon?" No, some people are oblivious to the fact that their argument is incorrect. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cupid Stunt Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 2 hours ago, Nute said: No, some people are oblivious to the fact that their argument is incorrect. That's so ironic it's funny I list some facts and you say "no", twat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nute Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 3 hours ago, Cupid Stunt said: That's so ironic it's funny I list some facts and you say "no", twat Evidently reading isn’t your strong point. I didn’t respond to any of your “facts” , just your comment to zzzzack, I suggest you go back and read what I posted, preferably with help from an adult. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cupid Stunt Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 7 hours ago, Nute said: Evidently reading isn’t your strong point. I didn’t respond to any of your “facts” , just your comment to zzzzack, I suggest you go back and read what I posted, preferably with help from an adult. Wank stain I'm well aware what a retard you was being. You been gargling Buckster's Jiz again 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nute Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Yeah, a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzak Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzak Posted January 29 Author Share Posted January 29 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Six30 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 On 27/01/2024 at 22:17, Cupid Stunt said: Wank stain I'm well aware what a retard you was being. You been gargling Buckster's Jiz again 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nute Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 23 hours ago, zzzak said: Garbage ... 2/10, taken out of context, clearly aimed at the easily led. Watch the whole interview where he mentions more about the trip/landing/coming home. In your part clip he is clearly referring to why we haven't been back to the moon in a long while as per the question he was asked by the young girl. Buzz once actually punched a conspiracy theorist in the chops - wasn't you was it? Whole interview - How ever many times your flimsy "proofs" are shown to be inaccurate you just go back to the web to look for more rather than actually think about the accuracy of what you post. It's called confirmation bias, look it up. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 2 minutes ago, Nute said: How ever many times your flimsy "proofs" are shown to be inaccurate you just go back to the web to look for more rather than actually think about the accuracy of what you post. It's called confirmation bias, look it up. Feel free to insult him, it's one of the good things about this place. Call him a twat or worse, it's free and it'll feel good, plus it's true. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzak Posted January 30 Author Share Posted January 30 Still haven't answered on the lack of tyre marks and how come the astronaut got in front of the cross, it should have been in front of him surely, by the way I like that you support Trump, any mention of him is support because it brings his name to the fore and I'm not talking about golf, there's another oddity, when the astronaut hit the golf ball someone at Houston commented on its slice, you can't slice a ball where there is no atmosphere, same with flags, no air means no flutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckster Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 9 hours ago, zzzak said: Still haven't answered on the lack of tyre marks and how come the astronaut got in front of the cross, it should have been in front of him surely, by the way I like that you support Trump, any mention of him is support because it brings his name to the fore and I'm not talking about golf, there's another oddity, when the astronaut hit the golf ball someone at Houston commented on its slice, you can't slice a ball where there is no atmosphere, same with flags, no air means no flutter. After all the altered images you have posted do you really think anyone will believe the veracity of anything you post? Oh look tyre tracks. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nute Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 15 hours ago, zzzak said: Still haven't answered on the lack of tyre marks and how come the astronaut got in front of the cross, it should have been in front of him surely, by the way I like that you support Trump, any mention of him is support because it brings his name to the fore and I'm not talking about golf, there's another oddity, when the astronaut hit the golf ball someone at Houston commented on its slice, you can't slice a ball where there is no atmosphere, same with flags, no air means no flutter. Is your word salad aimed at me? Every crackpot argument someone here proves to be rubbish just pushes you back to the web to come up with something else. Do your own research into why whatever you come up with is crap, I would say it’s not my job to educate you but I’m not sure educating you is possible. You are determined to believe this no matter how often you are shown your latest “evidence “ is wrong. No idea what you are on about with the golf stuff and I’ve never seen a video of the flag flapping, I cannot believe one exists. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cupid Stunt Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 20 hours ago, zzzak said: Still haven't answered on the lack of tyre marks and how come the astronaut got in front of the cross, it should have been in front of him surely, by the way I like that you support Trump, any mention of him is support because it brings his name to the fore and I'm not talking about golf, there's another oddity, when the astronaut hit the golf ball someone at Houston commented on its slice, you can't slice a ball where there is no atmosphere, same with flags, no air means no flutter. You should always double check the information you've been presented with zzzak, a simple Google image search and you'd have found untampered images Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cupid Stunt Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 20 hours ago, zzzak said: Still haven't answered on the lack of tyre marks and how come the astronaut got in front of the cross, it should have been in front of him surely, by the way I like that you support Trump, any mention of him is support because it brings his name to the fore and I'm not talking about golf, there's another oddity, when the astronaut hit the golf ball someone at Houston commented on its slice, you can't slice a ball where there is no atmosphere, same with flags, no air means no flutter. You should check your sources zzzak, always check the information you've been fed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzak Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 This is me on the left asking about tyre tracks and that is you on the right avoiding a simple question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzak Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 They must be around there somewhere, this is mans greatest moment, the first time to walk on the Moon but they lost all the data, it gets better, Scrap dealer finds Apollo-era NASA computers in dead engineer’s basement, So they found 325 Apollo era tapes and then they said, “There is no evidence that suggests this material is historically significant... I recommend disposal through the immediate destruction of all magnetic tapes.” Immediate destruction, what are they hiding, I think that I know, what I don;'t know is why all of you are so outraged about my questioning it, there are hundreds of things that point to a hoax but you refuse to see them, why ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzak Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 There is only one light source on the Moon, you may have heard of it, its called the Sun, sunlight can only cast shadows in one direction, there's no arguing that, so why are there shadows going is two directions, simple question, the answer is that there was more than one light source, as there was only one on the Moon that means that the photos were taken in a studio, any questions ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzak Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now